House Republican tax writers have advanced a "Tax Reform 2.0" legislative package. The measure is expected to reach the House floor for a full chamber vote by the end of September.

The House Ways and Means Committee debated the GOP Tax Reform 2.0 three-bill package in a September 13 markup that ran almost seven hours. The package focuses on making permanent individual and small business tax cuts, and creating incentives for retirement savings and business innovation. The following three bills were approved along party lines:

• Protecting Family and Small Business Tax Cuts Act of 2018 ( HR 6760);
• Family Savings Act of 2018 ( HR 6757); and
• American Innovation Act of 2018 ( HR 6756).

Individual, Small Business Tax Cuts

HR 6757 would make permanent the individual and small business tax cuts that were enacted temporarily through 2025 under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97). These provisions were made temporary to comply with certain Senate budget rules applicable to the reconciliation process Republicans used to pass tax reform with only a simple GOP majority. Notable TCJA provisions that would be made permanent under HR 6750 include, among others:

• lowered individual income tax rates;
• 20-percent deduction of income for qualifying passthrough entities;
• $12,000 (individual) and $24,000 (married filing jointly) standard deduction; and
• $10,000 annual cap on the state and local tax (SALT) deduction.

Family Savings and Business Innovation

HR 6757 aims to simplify certain rules for employer retirement plans, and eliminates the age limit on IRA contributions, among other things. Additionally, it would create a Universal Savings Account (USA), while also allowing tax-advantaged 529 Plans to be used for expenses related to trade schools, home schooling, and up to $10,000 in total distributions for repayment of student loans.

HR 6756 would improve the tax treatment of certain start-up businesses. The bill would allow new businesses to write off up to $20,000 of start-up and organization expenditures. Additionally, HR 6756 would allow for a change in start-up ownership without triggering limits on certain tax benefits.

JCT

The Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), a nonpartisan congressional scorekeeper, has estimated that all three bills will cost the federal government revenue. As noted in JCX-71-18, the JCT estimates that making permanent the individual and small business tax cuts under the TCJA, as proposed by HR 6750, would cost the federal government $631 billion in lost revenue over the next 10 years. Additionally, the JCT has estimated that HR 6756 and HR 6757, collectively, would cost approximately $26 billion in lost federal revenue over the next 10 years ( JCX-75-18, JCX-78-18).

Tax Reform 2.0’s Fate Uncertain

Tax Reform 2.0’s fate remains largely uncertain as it makes its way through the legislative process. While the measure is expected to garner enough Republican support in the House, despite certain GOP criticisms of the SALT deduction cap, it is not expected as a whole to fare well in the Senate. There is talk on Capitol Hill that Democrats could potentially support the retirement savings and business innovation bills in some form. However, it is considered unlikely that Democrats will support making permanent certain provisions of a law (the TCJA) for which not a single Democrat voted.

Charles P. "Chuck" Rettig was confirmed as the new IRS Commissioner on September 12. The Senate confirmed the nomination by a 64-to-33 vote. Rettig received both Democratic and Republican support.

Charles P. "Chuck" Rettig was confirmed as the new IRS Commissioner on September 12. The Senate confirmed the nomination by a 64-to-33 vote. Rettig received both Democratic and Republican support.

Senate Finance Committee (SFC) Chairman Orrin G. Hatch, R-Utah, praised Rettig, saying that he is both "qualified and ready" to lead the IRS. Although SFC ranking member Ron Wyden, D-Ore., previously said that Rettig is a "qualified nominee," he urged colleagues to oppose Rettig’s nomination. Wyden previously said he would only support Rettig’s nomination if he promised to reverse recent IRS guidance which limits Schedule B donor reporting for certain tax-exempt organizations ( Rev. Proc. 2018-38).

Rettig will oversee implementation of tax reform enacted last December under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97). His term as IRS Commissioner will expire on November 12, 2022.

New IRS guidance aiming to curb certain state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap "workarounds" is the latest "hot topic" tax debate on Capitol Hill. The IRS released proposed amendments to regulations, REG-112176-18, on August 23. The proposed rules would prevent taxpayers, effective August 27, 2018, from using certain charitable contributions to work around the new cap on SALT deductions.

New IRS guidance aiming to curb certain state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap "workarounds" is the latest "hot topic" tax debate on Capitol Hill. The IRS released proposed amendments to regulations, REG-112176-18, on August 23. The proposed rules would prevent taxpayers, effective August 27, 2018, from using certain charitable contributions to work around the new cap on SALT deductions.

SALT Deduction

The SALT deduction limit is one of the most controversial temporarily enacted provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97) signed into law last December. Under the TCJA, beginning in 2018 and running through 2025, taxpayers may not claim more than $10,000 ($5,000 if married filing separately) for all state and local sales, income and property taxes.

After the tax code overhaul, New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut (considered high-tax states) passed legislation that essentially allows taxpayers to circumvent the SALT deduction cap by making charitable contributions to state-run charitable organizations. Indeed, similar workarounds for private-school tuition already exists in other states.

"Congress limited the deduction for state and local taxes that predominantly benefited high-income earners to help pay for major tax cuts for American families,"Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said in a statement. "The proposed rule will uphold that limitation by preventing attempts to convert tax payments into charitable contributions."

Congressional Republicans and Democrats, as with the TCJA, are mostly divided on the topic. House Ways and Means Committee Chair Kevin Brady, R-Tex., praised the IRS proposal for aiming to prevent tax evasion. "These Treasury regulations rightly close the door on improper tax evasion schemes conjured up by state and local politicians who insist on brutally taxing local families and businesses," Brady said in a statement.

Meanwhile, Democratic lawmakers are criticizing the regulations. "The Trump administration doubled down on its attack on the middle class," Ways and Means ranking member Richard Neal, D-Mass., said in a statement. "The administration’s new regulations block affected states’ attempts to cope with this significant change and protect residents."

Tax Policy Experts Weigh-In

Several tax policy experts have criticized states’ efforts to circumvent the SALT deduction cap. Carl Davis, research director at the Democratic-leaning Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, has called the workarounds an "abuse" of the charitable giving deduction. "Anyone who wants a fair and transparent tax system should be cautiously optimistic that these rules will put an end…to the workaround provisions enacted by states more recently," Davis wrote in a recent op-ed about the proposed IRS guidance.

Jared Walczak, senior policy analyst at the conservative-leaning Tax Foundation, has said that states’ strategies to re-characterize SALT payments were pursued to primarily help high-income taxpayers. Additionally, the top one percent of the wealthiest households would reap more than half of the benefit if the SALT cap were eliminated, according to an estimate from the Democratic-leaning Tax Policy Center.

The IRS has proposed to remove the Code Sec. 385 documentation regulations provided in Reg. §1.385-2. Although the proposed removal of the documentation rules will apply as of the date the proposed regulations are published as final in the Federal Register, taxpayers can rely on the proposed regulations until the final regulations are published.

The IRS has proposed to remove the Code Sec. 385 documentation regulations provided in Reg. §1.385-2. Although the proposed removal of the documentation rules will apply as of the date the proposed regulations are published as final in the Federal Register, taxpayers can rely on the proposed regulations until the final regulations are published.

The documentation regulations provide minimum documentation requirements that must be satisfied in order for certain related-party instruments to be treated as debt for federal tax purposes. They are part of final and temporary Section 385 regulations adopted with T.D. 9790, I.R.B. 2016-45, 540. In addition to the documentation requirements, the Section 385 regulations also include rules that recharacterize as equity certain debt issued in connection with distributions and acquisitions that do not result in new investment in the operations of the issuer. The Section 385 regulations apply generally to debt instruments issued by a domestic corporations (or its disregarded entity) and held by members of the domestic corporation’s expanded group.

Documentation Regulations

The documentation rules generally require large corporations to document related-party loans just as all businesses do when they borrow from unrelated lenders. Reg. §1.385-2 prescribes the nature of the documentation necessary to substantiate the tax treatment of related-party instruments as debt. Taxpayers must be able to provide written evidence of four indebtedness factors analogous to those found in third-party loans.

Compliance with the documentation rules does not establish that an interest is debt. Instead, it serves only to satisfy the minimum documentation for making the determination under general federal tax principles. If a debt instrument is reclassified as stock due to a failure to meet the documentation requirements, it is treated as stock for all federal tax purposes.

Corporations must document relevant transactions under these rules if they are part of expanded affiliated groups and:

• stock of any member of the group is publicly traded;
• one or more members have total assets that exceed $100 million on any applicable financial statement or combination of statements; or
• one or more members have annual total revenue that exceeds $50 million on any applicable financial statement or combination of statements.

The documentation regulations apply to relevant intercompany debt issued beginning in 2019, and require that the taxpayer’s documentation for a given tax year be prepared by the time the borrower’s return is filed.

Executive Order 13789

Executive Order 13789, issued on April 21, 2017 (E.O. 13789), instructs the Treasury Secretary to identify significant tax regulations issued on or after January 1, 2016, that impose an undue financial burden on U.S. taxpayers, add undue complexity to the federal tax laws, or exceed the statutory authority of the IRS. The Treasury Secretary is instructed to take concrete actions to alleviate these burdens.

Based on E.O. 13789, the Treasury Department identified, among others, the Section 385 regulations adopted with T.D. 9790 as significant tax regulations that impose an undue financial burden on U.S. taxpayers and/or add undue complexity to the federal tax laws ( Notice 2017-38, I.R.B. 2017-30, 147).

In light of further actions in connection with the required review of the Section 385 regulations, and in response to continued taxpayer concern, the IRS has delayed the applicability date of the documentation regulations for 12 months. As a result, the documentation requirements apply to interests issued or deemed issued on or after January 1, 2019. As originally adopted, the final regulations applied to interests issued or deemed issued on or after January 1, 2018 ( Notice 2017-36, I.R.B. 2017-33, 208).

In a later report, the Treasury has proposed to revoke the current documentation rules and replace them with substantially simplified and streamlined documentation rules ( TDNR SM-0172, October 4, 2017; U.S. Department of the Treasury, Second Report to the President on Executive Order 13789, October 2, 2017).

Proposed Removal of Documentation Rules

The IRS has proposed to remove the documentation regulations after considering the comments received in connection with E.O. 13789, including with respect to Notice 2017-36 and Notice 2017-38. However, the IRS will continue to study the issues addressed by the documentation regulations, When the study is complete, the IRS may propose a modified version of the documentation regulations. The revised documentation rules:

• would be substantially simplified and streamlined to reduce the burden on U.S. corporations;
• would still require sufficient documentation and other information for tax administration purposes; and
• would be proposed with a prospective effective date to allow sufficient lead time for taxpayers to design and implement systems to comply with the revised requirements.

Comments

Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing must be received by December 23, 2018. Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-130244-17), room 5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand-delivered Monday through Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-130244-17), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20224 or sent electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov (IRS REG-130244-17).

Last year’s Tax Reform created a new 20-percent deduction of qualified business income for passthrough entities, subject to certain limitations. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97) created the new Code Sec. 199A passthrough deduction for noncorporate taxpayers, effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. However, the provision was enacted only temporarily through 2025. The controversial deduction has remained a buzzing topic of debate among lawmakers, tax policy experts, and stakeholders. In addition to its impermanence, the new passthrough deduction’s ambiguous statutory language has created many questions for taxpayers and practitioners.

Last year’s Tax Reform created a new 20-percent deduction of qualified business income for passthrough entities, subject to certain limitations. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97) created the new Code Sec. 199A passthrough deduction for noncorporate taxpayers, effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. However, the provision was enacted only temporarily through 2025. The controversial deduction has remained a buzzing topic of debate among lawmakers, tax policy experts, and stakeholders. In addition to its impermanence, the new passthrough deduction’s ambiguous statutory language has created many questions for taxpayers and practitioners.

The IRS released the much-anticipated proposed regulations on the new passthrough deduction, REG-107892-18, on August 8. The guidance has generated a mixed reaction on Capitol Hill, and while significant questions may have been answered, it appears that many remain. Indeed, an IRS spokesperson told Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting before the regulations were released that the IRS’s goal was to issue complete regulations but that the guidance "would not cover every question that taxpayers have."

Wolters Kluwer recently spoke with Joshua Wu, member, Clark Hill PLC, about the tax implications of the new passthrough deduction and proposed regulations. That exchange included a discussion of the impact that the new law and IRS guidance, both present and future, may have on taxpayers and tax practitioners.

I. Qualified Business Income and Activities

Wolters Kluwer: What is the effect of the proposed regulations requiring that qualified business activities meet the Code Sec. 162 trade or business standard? And for what industries might this be problematic?

Joshua Wu: The positive aspect of incorporating the Section 162 trade or business standard is that there is an established body of case law and administrative guidance with respect to what activities qualify as a trade or business. However, the test under Section 162 is factually-specific and requires an analysis of each situation. Sometimes courts reach different results with respect to activities constituting a trade or business. For example, gamblers have been denied trade or business status in numerous cases. In Groetzinger, 87-1 ustc ¶9191, 480 U.S. 23 (1987), the Court held that whether professional gambling is a trade or business depends on whether the taxpayer can show he pursued gambling full-time, in good faith, regularly and continuously, and possessed a sincere profit motive. Some courts have held that the gambling activity must be full-time, from 60 to 80 hours per week, while others have questioned whether the full-time inquiry is a mandatory prerequisite or permissive factor to determine whether the taxpayer’s gambling activity is a trade or business. See e.g., Tschetschot , 93 TCM 914, Dec. 56,840(M)(2007). Although Section 162 provides a built-in body of law, plenty of questions remain.

Aside from the gambling industry, the real estate industry will continue to face some uncertainty over what constitutes a trade or business under Code Secs. 162 and 199A. The proposed regulations provide a helpful rule, where the rental or licensing of tangible or intangible property to a related trade or business is treated as a trade or business if the rental or licensing and the other trade or business are commonly controlled. But, that rule does not help taxpayers in the rental industry with no ties to another trade or business. The question remains whether a taxpayer renting out a single-family home or a small group of apartments is engaged in a trade or business for purposes of Code Secs. 162 and 199A. Some case law indicates that just receiving rent with nothing more may not constitute a trade or business. On the other hand, numerous cases have found that managing property and collecting rent can constitute a trade or business. Given the potential tax savings at issue, I suspect there will be additional cases in the real estate industry regarding the level of activity required for the leasing of property to be considered a trade or business.

Qualified Business Income

Wolters Kluwer: How does the IRS define qualified business income (QBI)?

Joshua Wu: QBI is the net amount of effectively connected qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss from any qualified trade or business. Certain items are excluded from QBI, such as capital gains/losses, certain dividends, and interest income. Proposed Reg. §1.199A-3(b) provides further clarity on QBI. Most importantly, they provide that a passthrough with multiple trades or businesses must allocate items of QBI to such trades or businesses based on a reasonable and consistent method that clearly reflects income and expenses. The passthrough may use a different reasonable method for different items of income, gain, deduction, and loss, but the overall combination of methods must also be reasonable based on all facts and circumstances. Further, the books and records must be consistent with allocations under the method chosen. The proposed regulations provide no specific guidance or examples of what a reasonable allocation looks like. Thus, taxpayers are left to determine what constitutes a reasonable allocation.

Unadjusted Basis Immediately after Acquisition

Wolters Kluwer: What effect does the unadjusted basis immediately after acquisition (UBIA) of qualified property attributable to a trade or business have on determining QBI?

Joshua Wu: For taxpayers above the taxable income threshold amounts, $157,500 (single or married filing separate) or $315,000 (married filing jointly), the Code limits the taxpayer’s 199A deduction based on (i) the amount of W-2 wages paid with respect to the trade or business, and/or (ii) the unadjusted basis immediately after acquisition (UBIA) of qualified property held for use in the trade or business.

Where a business pays little or no wages, and the taxpayer is above the income thresholds, the best way to maximize the deduction is to look to the UBIA of qualified property. Rather than the 50 percent of W-2 wages limitation, Section 199A provides an alternative limit based on 25 percent of W-2 wages and 2.5 percent of UBIA qualified property. The Code and proposed regulations define UBIA qualified property as tangible, depreciable property which is held by and available for use in the qualified trade or business at the close of the tax year, which is used at any point during the tax year in the production of qualified business income, and the depreciable period for which has not ended before the close of the tax year. The proposed regulations helpfully clarify that UBIA is not reduced for taxpayers who take advantage of the expanded bonus depreciation allowance or any Section 179expensing.

De Minimis Exception

Wolters Kluwer: How is the specified service trade or business (SSTB) limitation clarified under the proposed regulations? And how does the de minimis exception apply?

Joshua Wu: The proposed regulations provide helpful guidance on the definition of a SSTB and avoid what some practitioners feared would be an expansive and amorphous area of section 199A. Under the statute, if a trade or business is an SSTB, its items are not taken into account for the 199A computation. Thus, the performance of services in the fields of health, law, accounting, actuarial science, performing arts, consulting, athletics, financial and brokerage services, investment management, trading, dealing in securities, and any trade or business where the principal asset of such is the reputation or skill of one or more of its employees or owners, do not result in a 199A deduction.

There is a de minimis exception to the general rule for taxpayers with taxable income of less than $157,500 (single or married filing separate) or $315,000 (married filing jointly). Once those thresholds are hit, the 199A deduction phases-out until it is fully eliminated at $207,500 (single) or $415,000 (joint).

The proposed regulations provide guidance for each of the SSTB fields. Importantly, they also limit the "reputation or skill" category. The proposed regulations state that the "reputation or skill" clause was intended to describe a "narrow set of trades or businesses, not otherwise covered by the enumerated specified services." Thus, the proposed regulations limit this definition to cases where the business receives income from endorsing products or services, licensing or receiving income for use of an individual’s image, likeness, name, signature, voice, trademark, etc., or receiving appearance fees. This narrow definition is unlikely to impact most taxpayers.

Wolters Kluwer recently spoke with Joshua Wu, member, Clark Hill PLC, about the tax implications of the new Code Sec. 199A passthrough deduction and its recently-released proposed regulations, REG-107892-18. That exchange included a discussion of the impact that the new law and IRS guidance, both present and future, may have on taxpayers and tax practitioners.

Wolters Kluwer recently spoke with Joshua Wu, member, Clark Hill PLC, about the tax implications of the new Code Sec. 199A passthrough deduction and its recently-released proposed regulations, REG-107892-18. That exchange included a discussion of the impact that the new law and IRS guidance, both present and future, may have on taxpayers and tax practitioners.

II. Aggregation, Winners & Losers

Wolters Kluwer: How do the proposed regulations provide both limitations and flexibility regarding the available election to aggregate trades or businesses?

Joshua Wu: Treasury agreed with various comments that some level of aggregation should be permitted to account for the legal, economic and other non-tax reasons that taxpayers operate a single business across multiple entities. Permissive aggregation allows taxpayers the benefit of combining trades or businesses for applying the W-2 wage limitation, potentially resulting in a higher limit. Under Proposed Reg. §1.199A-4, aggregation is allowed but not required. To use this method, the business must (1) qualify as a trade or business, (2) have common ownership, (3) not be a SSTB, and (4) demonstrate that the businesses are part of a larger, integrated trade or business (for individuals and trusts). The proposed regulations give businesses the benefits of electing aggregation without having to restructure the businesses from a legal standpoint. Businesses failing to qualify under the above test will have to consider whether a legal restructuring would be possible.

Wolters Kluwer: How does Notice 2018-64 Methods for Calculating W-2 Wages for Purposes of Section 199A, which accompanied the release of the proposed regulations, coordinate with aggregation?

Joshua Wu: Notice 2018-64 contains a proposed revenue procedure with guidance on three methods for calculating W-2 wages for purposes of section 199A. The Unmodified Box method uses the lesser of totals in Box 1 of Forms W-2 or Box 5 (Medicare wages). The Modified Box 1 method takes the total amounts in Box 1 of Forms W-2 minus amounts not wages for income withholding purposes, and adding total amounts in Box 12 (deferrals). The Tracking wages method is the most complex and tracks total wages subject to income tax withholding. The calculation method is dependent on the group of Forms W-2 included in the computation and, thus, will vary depending upon whether businesses are aggregated under §1.199A-4 or not. Taxpayers with businesses generating little or no Medicare wages may consider aggregating with businesses that report significant wages in Box 1 that are still subject to income tax withholding. Under the Modified Box 1 method, that may result in a higher wage limitation.

Crack & Pack

Wolters Kluwer: What noteworthy anti-abuse safeguards did the proposed regulations seek to establish? How do the rules address "cracking" or "crack and pack" strategies?

Joshua Wu: Treasury included some anti-abuse provisions in the proposed regulations. One area that Treasury noted was the use of multiple non-grantor trusts to avoid the income threshold limitations on the 199A deduction. Taxpayers could theoretically use multiple non-grantor trusts to increase the 199A deduction by taking advantage of each trust’s separate threshold amount. The proposed regulations, under the authority of 643(f), provide that two or more trusts will be aggregated and treated as a single trust if such trusts have substantially the same grantor(s) and substantially the same primary beneficiary or beneficiaries, and if a principal purpose is to avoid tax. The proposed regulations have a presumption of a principal purpose of avoiding tax if the structure results in a significant tax benefit, unless there is a significant non-tax purpose that could not have been achieved without the creation of the trusts.

Another anti-abuse issue relates to the "crack and pack" strategies. These strategies involve a business that is limited in its 199A deduction because it is an SSTB spinning off some of its business or assets to an entity that is not an SSTB and could claim the 199A deduction. For example, a law firm that owns its building could transfer the building to a separate entity and lease it back. The law firm is an SSTB and, thus, is subject to the 199A limitations. However, the real estate entity is not an SSTB and can generate a 199A deduction (based on the rental income) for the law partners. The proposed regulations provide that a SSTB includes any business with 50 percent common ownership (direct or indirect) that provides 80 percent or more of its property or services to an excluded trade or business. Also, if a trade or business shares 50 percent or more common ownership with an SSTB, to the extent that trade or business provides property or services to the commonly-owned SSTB, the portion of the property or services provided to the SSTB will be treated as an SSTB. The proposed regulations provide an example of a dentist who owns a dental practice and also owns an office building. The dentist rents half the building to the dental practice and half to unrelated persons. Under [Proposed Reg.] §1.199A-5(c)(2), the renting of half of the building to the dental practice will be treated as an SSTB.

Winners & Losers

Wolters Kluwer: Generally, what industries can be seen as "winners" and "losers" in light of the proposed regulations?

Joshua Wu: The most obvious "losers" in the proposed regulations are the specified services businesses (e.g., lawyers, accountants, doctors, etc.) who are further limited by the anti-abuse provisions in arranging their affairs to try and benefit from 199A. On the other hand, certain specific service providers benefit from the proposed regulations. For example, health clubs or spas are exempt from the SSTB limitation. Additionally, broadcasters of performing arts, real estate agents, real estate brokers, loan officers, ticket brokers, and art brokers are all exempt from the SSTB limitation.

Wolters Kluwer: What areas of the Code Sec. 199A provision stand out as most complex when calculating the deduction, and how does this complexity vary among taxpayers?

Joshua Wu: With respect to calculating the deduction, one complex area is planning to maximize the W-2 wages limitation. Because compensation as W-2 wages can reduce QBI, and potentially the 199A deduction, determining the efficient equilibrium point between having enough W-2 wages to limit the impact of the wage limitation, while preserving QBI, will be a fact-driven complex planning issue that must be determined by each taxpayer. Another area of complexity will be how taxpayers track losses which may reduce future QBI and, thus, the 199A deduction. The proposed regulations provide that losses disallowed for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2018, are not taken into account for purposes of computing QBI in a later taxable year. Taxpayers will be left to track pre-2018 and post-2018 losses and determine if a loss in a particular tax year reduces QBI or not.

III. Looking Ahead

Questions Remain

Wolters Kluwer: An IRS spokesperson told Wolters Kluwer that the IRS did not expect the proposed regulations to answer all questions surrounding the deduction. Indeed, Acting IRS Commissioner David Kautter has said that stakeholder feedback would help finalize the regulations. What significant questions remain unanswered for taxpayers and tax practitioners, and has additional uncertainty been created with the release of the IRS guidance?

Joshua Wu: On the whole, the proposed regulations did a good job addressing the most important areas of Section 199A. However, there are many areas where additional guidance would be helpful. Such guidance may be in the form of additional regulations or other administrative pathways. For example, the proposed regulations did not address the differing treatment between a taxpayer operating as a sole proprietor versus an S corporation. Wages paid to an S corporation shareholder boosts the W-2 limitation but are not considered QBI. Thus, with the same underlying facts, the 199Adeduction may vary between taxpayers operating as a sole proprietor versus those operating as an S corporation.

Possible Changes to Proposed Regulations

Wolters Kluwer: In what ways do you see the passthrough deduction rules changing when the final regulations are released?

Joshua Wu: I suspect that the core components of the proposed regulations will not change significantly. However, I would not be surprised if Treasury were to include more specific examples with respect to real estate and whether certain types of activity constitute a trade or business. Additionally, the proposed regulations will likely generate comments and questions from various industry groups related to the SSTB definitions and specific types of services (e.g., do trustees and executors fall under the legal services definition). Treasury may change the definitions of SSTBs in response to comments and clarify definitions for industry groups.

Tax Reform 2.0

Wolters Kluwer: The White House and congressional Republicans are currently moving forward on legislative efforts known as "Tax Reform 2.0." The legislative package proposes making permanent the passthrough deduction. How does the impermanence of this deduction currently impact taxpayers? (Note: On September 13, the House Ways and Means Committee marked up a three-bill Tax Reform 2.0 package. The measure is expected to reach the House floor for a full chamber vote by the end of September.)

Joshua Wu: The 199A deduction has a significant impact on the choice of entity question for businesses. With the 21 percent corporate rate, we have seen many taxpayers considering restructuring away from passthrough entities to a C corporation structure. The 199A deduction is a large consideration in whether to restructure or not, but its limited effective time does raise questions about the cost effectiveness of planning to obtain the 199A deduction where the benefit will sunset in eight years.

Key Takeways

Wolters Kluwer: Aside from advice on specific taxpayer situations, what key takeaways should tax practitioners generally alert clients to ahead of the 2019 tax filing season?

Wolters Kluwer: Aside from advice on specific taxpayer situations, what key takeaways should tax practitioners generally alert clients to ahead of the 2019 tax filing season?

Joshua Wu: Practitioners should remind clients who may benefit from the 199A deduction to keep detailed records of any losses for each line of business, as this may impact the calculation of QBI in the future. Practitioners should also help clients examine the whole of their activity to define their "trades or businesses." This will be essential to calculating the 199A deduction and planning to maximize any such deduction. Finally, practitioners should remember that some of the information that may be necessary to determine a 199A deduction may not be in their client’s possession. Practitioners need to plan in advance with their clients regarding how information about each trade or business will be obtained (e.g., how will a limited partner in a partnership obtain information regarding the partnership’s W-2 wages and/or UBIA of qualified property).

Wolters Kluwer: Any closing thoughts or comments?

Joshua Wu: Practitioners and taxpayers should remember that the regulations are only proposed and may change before they become final. Any planning undertaken this year should carefully weigh the economic costs and be rooted in the statutory language of 199A. It will be some time before case law helps clarify the nuances of Section 199A, and claiming the deduction allows the IRS to more easily impose the substantial understatement penalty if a taxpayer gets it wrong.

Wolters Kluwer has projected annual inflation-adjusted amounts for tax year 2019. The projected amounts include 2019 tax brackets, the standard deduction, and alternative minimum tax amounts, among others. The projected amounts are based on Consumer Price Index figures released by the U.S. Department of Labor on September 12, 2018.

Wolters Kluwer has projected annual inflation-adjusted amounts for tax year 2019. The projected amounts include 2019 tax brackets, the standard deduction, and alternative minimum tax amounts, among others. The projected amounts are based on Consumer Price Index figures released by the U.S. Department of Labor on September 12, 2018.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97) mandated a change from the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) to the Chained Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (C-CPI-U). Official amounts for 2019 should be released by the IRS later in 2018.

Individual Tax Brackets

The projected bracket ranges for individuals in 2019 are as follows.

For married taxpayers filing jointly:

The 10 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes up to $19,400
The 12 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $19,400 and up to $78,900
The 22 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $78,900 and up to $168,400
The 24 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $168,400 and up to $321,450
The 32 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $321,450 and up to $408,200
The 35 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $408,200 and up to $612,350
The 37 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $612,350

For heads of households:

The 10 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes up to $13,850
The 12 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $13,850 and up to $52,850
The 22 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $52,850 and up to $84,200
The 24 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $84,200 and up to $160,700
The 32 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $160,700 and up to $204,100
The 35 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $204,100 and up to $510,300
The 37 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $510,300

For unmarried taxpayers:

The 10 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes up to $9,700
The 12 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $9,700 and up to $39,450
The 22 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $39,450 and up to $84,200
The 24 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $84,200 and up to $160,700
The 32 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $160,700 and up to $204,100
The 35 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $204,100 and up to $510,300
The 37 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $510,300

For married taxpayers filing separately:

The 10 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes up to $9,700
The 12 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $9,700 and up to $39,450
The 22 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $39,450 and up to $84,200
The 24 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $84,200 and up to $160,725
The 32 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $160,725 and up to $204,100
The 35 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $204,100 and up to $306,175
The 37 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $306,175

For estates and trusts:

The 10 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes up to $2,600
The 24 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $2,600 and up to $9,300
The 35 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $9,300 and up to $12,750
The 37 percent bracket applies to taxable incomes over $12,750

Standard Deduction

TCJA also roughly doubled the amount of the standard deduction. For 2019, the following standard deduction amounts are projected:

For married taxpayers filing jointly, $24,400
For heads of households, $18,350
For unmarried taxpayers and well as married taxpayers filing separately, $12,200

AMT Exemptions

TCJA eliminated the AMT for corporations, and increased the exemption amounts, and the exemption phaseouts, for individuals. For 2019, the AMT exemption amounts are projected to be:

For married taxpayers filing jointly, $111,700
For unmarried individuals and heads of households, $71,700
For married taxpayers filing separately, $55,850

Estate and Gift Tax

The following amounts related to transfer taxes (estate, generation-skipping, and gift taxes) are projected for 2019:

The gift tax annual exemption is projected to be $15,000 in 2019

The estate and gift tax applicable exclusion (increased under TCJA) is projected to be $11,400,000 for decedents dying in 2019

The exclusion for gifts made in 2019 to a spouse who is not a U.S. citizen is projected to be $155,000 for 2019

Other Amounts

The following other amounts are also projected for 2019:

The adoption credit for 2019 is projected to be $14,080 for 2019.

For 2019, the allowed Roth IRA contribution amount is projected to phase out for married taxpayers filing jointly with income between $193,000 and $203,000 For heads of household and unmarried filers, the projected phaseout range is between $122,000 to $137,000.

The maximum amount of deductible contributions that can be made to an IRA is projected to be $6,000 for 2019. The increased contribution amount for taxpayers age 50 and over will, therefore, be $7,000.

The deduction for traditional IRA contributions is projected to begin to phase out for married joint filers whose income is greater than $103,000 if both spouses are covered by a retirement plan at work. If only one spouse is covered by a retirement plan at work, the phaseout is projected to begin when modified adjusted gross income reaches $193,000. For heads of household and unmarried filers who are covered by a retirement plan at work, the 2019 income phaseout range for deductible IRA contributions is projected to begin at $64,000.

For 2019, the $2,500 student loan interest deduction is projected to begin to phase out for married joint filers with modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) above $140,000. For single taxpayers, the 2019 deduction is projected to begin to phase out at a MAGI level of over $70,000.

The amount of the 2019 foreign earned income exclusion under Code Sec. 911 is projected to be $105,900.

A pre-tax benefit can come in a variety of shapes and sizes, but usually can fit into one of two categories.

A pre-tax benefit can come in a variety of shapes and sizes, but usually can fit into one of two categories.

Most are benefits that an employee elects to pay for by using a portion of his or her compensation that would have otherwise been taxed as salary. The other category consists of benefits paid by your employer on a take-it-or-leave-it basis for which you are not taxed.

Pre-tax benefits usually are provided either within a cafeteria plan or separately.

Cafeteria plan pre-tax benefits

A cafeteria plan is a written plan under which all participants are employees who may choose among two or more benefits consisting of cash and qualified benefits.

Qualified benefits include:

1. Accident or health plan coverage;
2. Dependent care assistance;
3. Contributions to a cash or deferred arrangement such as 401(k) plans; and
4. Taxable and nontaxable group-term life insurance.

In general, the benefits that may be offered under a cafeteria plan are those that are not includable in the employee's gross income because of a specific Internal Revenue Code provision. However, cash, group-term life insurance on an employee's life in excess of $50,000, and group-term life insurance on the lives of the employee's spouse or dependents may be provided under a cafeteria plan even though they are taxable. Employees are not taxed on taxable options offered under a cafeteria plan unless they elect to receive them.

Other pre-tax fringe benefits

Employees are taxed on fringe benefits unless the benefits are specifically excluded from income by the Internal Revenue Code. Benefits that are specifically not included in an employee's taxable salary include:

1. Benefits that can be offered in a cafeteria plan, but are instead offered separately;
2. No-additional-cost services ("excess-capacity" services offered for sale to customers);
3. Employee discounts;
4. Working condition fringe benefits (for example, the use of a company car for business);
5. De minimis fringe benefits (benefits too small to count, such as occasional personal use of the company photocopier, or an occasional free ticket to a sporting event);
6. Qualified moving expense reimbursements;
7. Qualified retirement planning services; and
8. Qualified transportation fringe benefits (including van pooling, transit passes and qualified parking, up to specified dollar limits).

In connection with the last item-qualified transportation fringe benefits-either the employer can fund this benefit directly for everyone or only those employees who choose to receive this benefit can have a portion of their salary used to fund it.

Flexible spending accounts

A flexible spending account (FSA) can either form part of a cafeteria plan or it can be offered as a separate pre-tax fringe benefit. Either way, its purpose is to use funds that would otherwise be paid out as taxable salary to pay for certain benefits on a pre-tax basis.

An FSA is an arrangement under which an amount is credited to an account from which an employee may be reimbursed for health care, dependent care or other expenses that are excludable from gross income if paid by an employer. A separate account must be set up to pay for each type of expense, and the account cannot be drawn upon in any way other than for reimbursement of that type of expense. Beginning in 2013, an FSA for health care costs cannot exceed a $2,500 annual limit, as required under the Affordable Care Act.

The account may be funded by employer contributions or by a salary reduction agreement. An FSA can be a cafeteria plan if it is funded by a salary reduction agreement or otherwise allows employees to choose to receive cash instead of a qualified benefit. It is not a cafeteria plan if employees are not given this choice.

Please contact this office if you have any questions about taking advantage of pre-tax fringe benefits.

The Electronic Federal Tax Payment System (EFTPS) allows individuals and businesses to make tax payments by telephone, personal computer or through the Internet.

The Electronic Federal Tax Payment System (EFTPS) allows individuals and businesses to make tax payments by telephone, personal computer or through the Internet.

Paperless

EFTPS is one of the most user-friendly programs developed by the IRS. EFTPS is totally paperless. Everything is done by telephone or computer. Because it's electronic, it's available 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

You make your tax payments electronically by:

· Calling EFTPS; or

· Using special computer software or the Internet.

Who can use EFTPS

EFTPS is available to businesses and individuals but businesses have more options.

Businesses: If your total deposits of federal taxes are more than $200,000 each year, you must use EFTPS. If not, you can still use EFTPS but you're not required to.

To calculate the $200,000 threshold, you have to include every federal tax your business pays, such as payroll, income, excise, social security, railroad retirement, and any other federal taxes.

The IRS wants businesses to use EFTPS and makes it difficult to stop using it. Once you meet the $200,000 threshold, you have to continue using EFTPS even if your annual tax deposits fall below $200,000 in the future.

Individuals: Individuals can also use EFTPS. Many of the individuals using EFTPS are making quarterly estimated tax payments but it's also available to people paying federal estate and gift taxes and installment payments.

How EFTPS works

There are two versions of EFTPS: direct and through a financial institution.

Direct: EFTPS-Direct is just what the name suggests. You access EFTPS directly - by telephone or computer - and make your tax payments. You tell EFTPS when you want to deposit your taxes and on that date EFTPS tells your bank to transfer the funds from your account to the IRS. At the same time, the IRS updates your payroll tax records to reflect the deposit.

Example. Your payroll taxes are due on the 15th. You have to contact EFTPS by 8PM at least one day before your tax due date. You either call EFTPS or log-on using special software or through the Internet. You enter your payment and EFTPS automatically debits your bank account and transfers the funds to the IRS on the date you indicate.

If you're a business, you can schedule your tax deposits up to 120 days before the due date. Individuals can schedule tax deposits up to 365 days before the due date.

Through a financial institution: You can also access EFTPS through a bank or credit union. Instead of contacting EFTPS directly and making your tax payments, your bank does it for you. Not all banks and credit unions participate in EFTPS so you have to check with your financial institution.

Only businesses can use EFTPS through a financial institution. If you're an individual and you want to use EFTPS, you have to use it directly. Also, while EFTPS-Direct is free, some financial institutions charge a fee for accessing EFTPS.

Getting started

To access EFTPS, you have to enroll. Your tax advisor can help you navigate the enrollment process and, once you're part of EFTPS, he or she can make the payments for you.

Q: What tax deductions am I entitled to as an investor?

A: Certain investment-related expenses are deductible, others are specifically restricted. Still others won't get you a deduction, but you will be able to add them to your tax basis in the underlying investment, or net them from the amount you are otherwise considered to have received on its sale.

Certain investment-related expenses are deductible, while others are specifically restricted. Still other expenses likely will not provide you with a deduction, but you will be able to add them to your tax basis in the underlying investment, or net them from the amount you are otherwise considered to have received on its sale.

Investor expenses

Investment counsel fees, custodian fees, fees for clerical help, office rent, state and local transfer taxes, and similar expenses that you pay in connection with your investments are deductible as an itemized deduction on Schedule A of Form 1040, subject to the 2% floor for all such itemized deductions.

Travel expenses related to the production or collection of income are deductible if you provide proof both of the expenses and the necessity for incurring them. Deductions for travel expenses related to attending investment seminars, however, are specifically prohibited. Travel expenses to attend stockholder meetings are permissible deductions only if travel is not for personal reasons and expenses are reasonable in relation to value of the investment.

Interest expenses

If you take out a loan to carry investment property, you are entitled to an itemized deduction for the interest you pay, reported on Form 4952, which is limited to your net investment income (dividends, interest, rents, etc.) Margin interest paid connected with your stock portfolio qualifies. The investment interest deduction is not subject to the 2% floor - you can start with deducting the first dollar of interest paid. Any disallowed interest over the net investment income limit can be carried over to a succeeding tax year.

Caution. Net capital gain from the disposition of investment property is not considered investment income. However, you may elect to treat all or any portion of such net capital gain as investment income by paying tax on the elected amounts at their ordinary income rates. This is usually not advisable.

Brokerage commissions

Brokerage commissions related to a particular stock purchase or sell, on the other hand, are considered a cost of the sale itself. As such, any commissions paid to buy a stock are added to your tax basis in the shares, which will later determine the amount of taxable gain you have when the property is sold. Any commission on the sale of the shares is netted from the amount you will be considered to realize on that sale.

Once you retire or reach age 70 ½ (depending on your retirement plan), the law requires that you start making -at a minimum-some periodic withdrawals. These withdrawals are called required minimum distributions.

Why required minimum distributions?

First, the tax policy behind letting you save in a tax-deferred account was to allow you to use those funds in your retirement, rather than to use them as just another way to build up your estate for your heirs. Second, because those accounts are usually tax-deferred, withdrawals after retirement are taxed to you as ordinary income. As a result, the IRS wants you to withdraw at least a minimum amount from those accounts each year so that it can be taxed.

New IRS rules substantially simplify the computation of required minimum distributions (RMDs). In addition, Congress has forced the IRS to adopt new life expectancy tables that reflect longer life expectancies, resulting in distributions to be made over a longer time-period and for the RMD to be smaller than would have been required in previous years.

Good tax news

Good news for taxpayers who are interested in retaining funds in their IRAs and their tax-qualified plans because it means deferring income tax on the funds even longer.

If you are alive in the year in which you must begin required minimum distributions, your new MRD is calculated each year by dividing the account balance by your life expectancy, as determined by the uniform distribution period table (the "Uniform Table") in the new IRS rules.

Example. At the time his required beginning date is reached (usually retirement or 70 ½), John Smith had a balance of $1 million in his IRA, as of the previous December 31. He previously named a beneficiary, who is age 67.

The difference in the computation of the RMD under the new rules is dramatic.

Under pre-2001 rules, he checks the joint and last survivor table and finds that his divisor for his $1 million account is 22.

Under revised rules in effect in 2001, his divisor is 26.2.

Under the new Uniform Lifetime Tables now in effect, his divisor is 27.4.

The difference in required distributions is significant.

Under pre-2001 rules, John must withdraw at least $45,454 this year

Under the 2001 rules, John must withdraw at least $38,168 this year.

Under the new tables, John must withdraw at least $36,496 this year.

Because of the new regulations, John has an extra $8,958 in his IRA at the end of the year over what he could have kept under the rules only a few years ago. This amount can then continue to accumulate earnings. This savings can be realized-and compounded-every subsequent year for the next 27 years. As a bonus, John's federal income tax (assuming a marginal rate of 35 percent) is more than $3,135 less ($12,773 instead of $15,908).

If you die before reaching your retirement having designated your spouse as beneficiary, distributions must begin by December 31 of the year following your death or the year that you would have turned 70½, whichever is later. At that time, RMD is computed over your spouse's life expectancy.

Caution!

The new rules-although more flexible-leave little room for mistakes in timing. Failure to take the minimum required distribution by the RBD will result in a 50 percent excise tax equal to half of the amount that should have been paid out but wasn't. Although early versions of proposed legislation included a decrease in the penalty from 50 percent to 10 percent, that provision is not the law.

If you'd like more specific advice on how the new Minimum Required Distribution rules apply to your retirement strategies, please contact this office.

Making gifts is a useful, and often overlooked, tax strategy. However, when thinking about whether to make a gift, or gifts, to your children or other minors, the tax consequences must be evaluated very carefully. Many times, though, the tax consequences can be beneficial and lower your tax bill.

When thinking about whether to make a gift, or gifts, to your children or other minors, the tax consequences must be evaluated very carefully. Many times, though, the tax consequences can be beneficial and lower your tax bill.

Different strategies, whether used alone or in combination, can produce the most advantageous tax results for you and the recipients of your generosity. However, everyone's situation is unique so before you start making gifts, talk to a tax professional.

Basic considerations

-- Generally, a minor is any person under age 18.

-- Different tax rules apply to gifts to minors under age 19 and minors under age 14.

-- Unearned income exceeding $950 (the 2009 amount) of a minor who is under 19 years of age (and college students who are under 24 years of age) will generally be taxed at the highest marginal rate of his or her parents under the "kiddie tax" rules.

-- Income from property given to a minor who is 14 years old or older will be taxed at the minor's marginal income tax rate.

-- If a minor's gift is in trust, there is a 15 percent tax rate on the first $2,300 (the 2009 amount) each year that grows in the trust.

Estate tax

The tax on your estate is determined at the time of your death. Making gifts over your lifetime is often overlooked and undervalued as a means of reducing your estate tax. When you make gifts of money or property during your life the net result is a smaller estate and a smaller tax. Also, when you give a gift of property to a minor, which later increases in value, your estate will not be taxed on this increase in value.

Annual exclusion

In general, you can give away up to $13,000 in 2009 to anyone (including minors) during the year, tax-free. You and your spouse, together, can also give up to $26,000, tax-free, in 2009, to each donee.

UGMA/UTMA accounts

Under the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (UGMA) or the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (UTMA), annual gifts can be made by individuals to a custodial account.

Tax-free gifts can be made under the UGMA. In 2009, each taxpayer can transfer up to $13,000--and each married couple can transfer up to $26,000--to a custodial account. Some of the earnings will receive tax exemption while some or all of the earnings will receive taxation at the minor's tax rate. One drawback to UGMA accounts, however, is that the gifts are irrevocable. Another drawback is that if a student applies for financial aid, UGMA accounts may be deemed assets of the student that are part of the student's contribution toward his or her educational expenses.

UGMA and UTMA accounts have another downside that many parents dislike. When the minor reaches 18 or 21 years of age (depending upon state law), the child can generally do whatever he or she wants with the custodial account money. (That's why some individuals prefer "Crummey" trusts, which are discussed below.)

UTMA accounts operate very similarly to UGMA accounts. However, UTMA accounts let individuals make property gifts to their children that are tax-free.

Trusts

If you use property that does not produce income (such as a life insurance policy) to fund a minor's trust, this can have bad tax consequences. The IRS could assert that the true value of the gift cannot be determined, causing unavailability of the annual exclusion.

With a "Crummey" trust, your gift can stay in trust for as long as you desire without giving up the annual exclusion. However, contributions to a "Crummey" trust do not qualify for the annual exclusion unless the beneficiary receives notification that the contributions were made and is given a limited time (usually 30 days) to withdraw the contribution.

It is understood that the beneficiary will not withdraw the money or property. However, such an understanding should not be written because the IRS will use any evidence to say that the beneficiary had no withdrawal power.

If you are planning to make some gifts to your children or other minors, contact the office for additional guidance so we can make sure you get the best tax breaks possible.

No use worrying. More than five million people every year have problems getting their refund checks so your situation is not uncommon. Nevertheless, you should be aware of the rules, and the steps to take if your refund doesn't arrive.

Average wait time

The IRS suggests that you allow for "the normal processing time" before inquiring about your refund. The IRS's "normal processing time" is approximately:

• Paper returns: 6 weeks
• E-filed returns: 3 weeks
• Amended returns: 12 weeks
• Business returns: 6 weeks

IRS website "Where's my refund?" tool

The IRS now has a tool on its website called "Where's my refund?" which generally allows you to access information about your refund 72 hours after the IRS acknowledges receipt of your e-filed return, or three to four weeks after mailing a paper return. The "Where's my refund?" tool can be accessed at www.irs.gov.

To get out information about your refund on the IRS's website, you will need to provide the following information from your return:

• Your Social Security Number (or Individual Taxpayer Identification Number);
• Filing status (Single, Married Filing Joint Return, Married Filing Separate Return, Head of Household, or Qualifying Widow(er)); and
• The exact whole dollar amount of your refund.

 Start a refund trace

If you have not received your refund within 28 days from the original IRS mailing date shown on Where's My Refund?, you can start a refund trace online.

Getting a replacement check

If you or your representative contacts the IRS, the IRS will determine if your refund check has been cashed. If the original check has not been cashed, a replacement check will be issued. If it has been cashed, get ready for a long wait as the IRS processes a replacement check.

The IRS will send you a photocopy of the cashed check and endorsement with a claim form. After you send it back, the IRS will investigate. Sometimes, it takes the IRS as long as one year to complete its investigation, before it cuts you a replacement check.

A bigger problem

Another problem may come to the fore when the IRS is contacted about the refund. It might tell you that it never received your tax return in the first place. Here's where some quick action is important.

First, you are required to show that you filed your return on time. That's a situation when a post-office or express mail receipt really comes in handy. Second, get another, signed copy off to the IRS as quickly as possible to prevent additional penalties and interest in case the IRS really can prove that you didn't file in the first place.

Minimize the risks

When filing your return, you can choose to have your refund directly deposited into a bank account. If you file a paper return, you can request direct deposit by giving your bank account and routing numbers on your return. If you e-file, you could also request direct deposit. All these alternatives to receiving a paper check minimize the chances of your refund getting lost or misplaced.

If you've moved since filing your return, it's possible that the IRS sent your refund check to the wrong address. If it is returned to the IRS, a refund will not be reissued until you notify the IRS of your new address. You have to use a special IRS form.

IRS may have a reason

You may not have received your refund because the IRS believes that you aren't entitled to one. Refund claims are reviewed -usually only in a cursory manner-- by an IRS service center or district office. Odds are, however, that unless your refund is completely out of line with your income and payments, the IRS will send you a check unless it spots a mathematical error through its data-entry processing. It will only be later, if and when you are audited, that the IRS might challenge the size of your refund on its merits.

IRS liability

If the IRS sends the refund check to the wrong address, it is still liable for the refund because it has not paid "the claimant." It is also still liable for the refund if it pays the check on a forged endorsement. Direct deposit refunds that are misdirected to the wrong account through no fault of your own are treated the same as lost or stolen refund checks.

The IRS can take back refunds that were paid by mistake. In an erroneous refund action, the IRS generally has the burden of proving that the refund was a mistake. Nevertheless, although you may be in the right and eventually get your refund, it may take you up to a year to collect. One consolation: if payment of a refund takes more than 45 days, the IRS must pay interest on it.

If you are still worrying about your refund check, please give this office a call. We can track down your refund and seek to resolve any problem that the IRS may believe has developed.

Is a property transfer to your child or other minor a possible event on your horizon? If it is, just don't cover yourself on the tax consequences of such transfers. There are important legal considerations over and above the transfer's tax impact.

If you're considering a substantial gift to a young child, usually you don't let him or her take direct control of the property. Instead, one of two popular ways of transferring property is generally used -- through custodianships and trusts. Here are some points to consider.

Custodianship

Most states have adopted the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (UTMA), with some variations. Under the UTMA, a person can transfer any type of property to a custodian (an adult), who manages it for a minor's benefit (the minor owns the property) until the minor reaches a certain age (the "age of majority," which is 18 or 21, depending on state law).

Since a minor or custodian could face possible personal liability problems via ownership of cars, real estate, etc., the UTMA in general gives protection for the minor and custodian from personal liability (if they are not personally at fault) to third parties.

However, custodianships can have drawbacks:

• When the minor reaches the specified age, there is no guarantee he or she will handle the property in a responsible manner.
  
• Once a person transfers the property to a custodial account, that donor can no longer get it back. Taking money from the custodial account could cause someone to be sued, or it could be prosecuted as a criminal act.
  
• Custodial accounts may cause financial aid from colleges to be reduced -- those amounts are considered to go 100 percent toward what a student is expected to contribute for his or her educational expenses.
  
• A custodianship can be set up for only one beneficiary -- for instance a parent cannot legally transfer money from the custodial account of one of their children to the custodial account of another.

Trusts

People often opt to use custodianships rather than trusts because there is less paperwork and generally lower administrative costs. Custodianships can be set up quite informally, while trusts can be more elaborate and require more formalities.

When large amounts are involved, most people use trusts rather than custodianships even though there are greater administrative costs. For instance, a trust will give someone more flexibility to specify at what age a trust beneficiary will be distributed trust funds. A trust can also allow the donor to split benefits among several beneficiaries.

If you are thinking about making a cash or other property transfer to a minor, please contact this office so that we can further discuss how to use the various options to properly carry out your intentions.

Q: An extension to file my tax return seems such a painless procedure, is there any good reason for me not to postpone my filing deadline to avoid just one more hassle during the busy start of Spring?

Q: An extension to file my tax return seems such a painless procedure, is there any good reason for me not to postpone my filing deadline to avoid just one more hassle during the busy start of Spring?

A: Many taxpayers unrealistically and, to their own detriment, believe that when the IRS grants them an extension to file their tax return, it is the "magic wand" that waves away all tax concerns until the extended filing deadline is upon them. This is not the case. Even though getting extensions has been made easier--individuals can obtain an automatic four-month extension by phone, the mail or computer, and an additional two months is granted for qualifying taxpayers--there are drawbacks, and certainly "no free rides."

When a taxpayer gets an extension to file his or her return, this does not mean that he or she has more time in which to pay any taxes that are owed without interest or penalty. An extension to file also does not extend the time for payment of taxes. Your ultimate tax liability is an official obligation that starts on April 15^th, 2008. You don't have to pay; but if you don't pay, interest charges (currently 7 percent, compounded daily) are applicable to any tax unpaid after the regular deadline. And that may only be the start.

If payments by the regular deadline are less than 90 percent of the actual 2007 tax, the IRS also has the right to asses a 0.5 percent per month late filing penalty. In addition, you must properly estimate the amount of total tax liability based on current information when filing for an extension. If the IRS later determines that estimate to be unreasonable, it can treat the extension as completely void and assess hefty failure-to-file penalties.

An extension, and not filing until October 15^th also means that you won't receive a stimulus rebate check (up to $600 for individuals and $1,200 for joint filers, not including any applicable $300 rebate for a qualifying child) until November or early December, rather than based on the May through July distribution schedule for those filing their 2007 returns by the regular April 15^th, 2008 deadline.

Some procedural pitfalls can also surprise taxpayers who had every intention of making a proper extension request. For example, if a husband and wife file separate returns, an automatic extension application filed by one does not give an extension of the filing time to the other.

It's always nice to have extra cash lying around in your business. Say you've had a good year, but you want to wait awhile before plowing the profits back into the business. Are there any potential tax problems involved if you keep that extra cash in your business' investment account rather than withdrawing it to put in your own personal portfolio? You bet there are ... if you operate your business as a regular taxable corporation.

It's always nice to have extra cash lying around in your business. Perhaps you've had a good year, but want to wait awhile before putting the profits back into the business. Are there any potential tax problems involved if you keep that extra cash in your business' investment account rather than withdrawing it to put in your own personal portfolio? You bet there are ... if you operate your business as a regular taxable corporation.

The accumulated earnings tax trap

If your business is taxed as a regular "C" corporation and the IRS believes that your corporation has retained cash beyond "the reasonable needs of the business," it can assess an additional tax on the corporation, in addition to normal corporate income taxes. The tax is called the accumulated earnings tax.

For tax years beginning before 2011, the accumulated earnings tax is equal to 15 percent of accumulated taxable income. Accumulated taxable income is taxable income, with adjustments, reduced by dividends paid deduction and earnings accumulated for reasonable business needs or minimum credit amount.

For tax years beginning after 2010, the rate of the accumulated earnings tax, which is imposed on the excess accumulated taxable income, is imposed at the highest rate of tax for single individuals. Currently, the highest tax rate for individuals is 35 percent, but may rise back to 39 percent in 2010 under proposals set forth by the Obama Administration.

If your business is either unincorporated or is taxed as a pass-through entity such as a Subchapter S corporation, it is not subject to the accumulated earnings tax. You get a "free pass" on the accumulated earnings tax because all profits are "passed through" to you as the owner automatically, with usually nothing paid on the corporate or entity level.

Avoiding accumulated earnings tax

What does your corporation need to do to demonstrate to the IRS that its current amount of retained earnings does not exceed the reasonable needs of the business?

IRS rules list the following as acceptable grounds for accumulating income:

(1) Business expansion and plant replacement,

(2) Acquisition of a business through purchase of stock or assets,

(3) Debt retirement,

(4) Working capital, and

(5) Investments or loans to suppliers or customers necessary for the maintenance of the corporation's business.

On the other hand, unacceptable grounds for accumulating income are:

(1) Loans to shareholders and expenditures for their personal benefit,

(2) Loans to relatives and friends of shareholders or to others with no reasonable connection with the business,

(3) Loans to a related corporation (common ownership),

(4) Investments that are not related to the business, and

(5) Accumulations to protect against unrealistic hazards.

Worse yet - the personal holding company tax

If -- due to a large surplus in your business' cash account in any particular year-- the investment income from your corporation becomes its main source of income, watch out! Your business may qualify as a  "personal holding company." A personal holding company tax is imposed on any corporation that meets the definition of a personal holding company even if the corporation was formed for legitimate business reasons. Personal holding companies are subject to an additional tax on any undistributed personal holding company income.

Any and all undistributed earnings of a personal holding company are subject to a 15 percent penalty tax in 2009 and 2010. This tax is imposed on top of the regular corporate income tax. Although the personal holding company tax should usually be avoided at all cost, it nearly always can be avoided with some planning.

If you anticipate holding more of your business profits than usual on the sidelines as cash for a while, please contact this office. We can make certain that you don't fall into a tax-trap situation that might otherwise be overlooked.

Q. My husband and I have a housekeeper come in to clean once a week; and someone watches our children for about 10 hours over the course of each week to free up our time for chores. Are there any tax problems here that we are missing?

Q. My husband and I have a housekeeper come in to clean once a week; and someone watches our children for about 10 hours over the course of each week to free up our time for chores. Are there any tax problems here that we are missing?

A. Cooking, cleaning and childcare: domestic concerns - or tax issues? The answer is both. A few years ago, several would-be Presidential appointees were rejected -- when it was revealed that they had failed to pay payroll taxes for their domestic help. The IRS is aggressively looking for cheaters so it's particularly important that you don't stumble through ignorance in not fulfilling your obligations.

Who is responsible

Employers are responsible for withholding and paying payroll taxes for their employees. These taxes include federal, state and local income tax, social security, workers' comp, and unemployment tax. But which domestic workers are employees? The housekeeper who works in your home five days a week? The nanny who is not only paid by you but who lives in a room in your home? The babysitter who watches your children on Saturday nights?

In general, anyone you hire to do household work is your employee if you control what work is done and how it is done. It doesn't matter if the worker is full- or part-time or paid on an hourly, daily, or weekly basis. The exception is an independent contractor. If the worker provides his or her own tools and controls how the work is done, he or she is probably an independent contractor and not your employee. If you obtain help through an agency, the household worker is usually considered their employee and you have no tax obligations to them.

What it costs

In general, if you paid cash wages of at least $1,300 in 2001 to any household employee, you must withhold and pay social security and Medicare taxes. The tax is 15.3 percent of the wages paid. You are responsible for half and your employee for the other half but you may choose to pay the entire amount. If you pay cash wages of at least $1,000 in any quarter to a household employee, you are responsible for paying federal unemployment tax, usually 0.8 percent of cash wages.

Deciding who is an employee is not easy. Contact us for more guidance.

In the wake of the Enron collapse has come a new interest in the accounting profession and the spin on the news is often not too flattering. That's wrong. Accounting professionals play a very important role in our global economy but it's a role not too many people understand.

In a nutshell, auditors certify the accuracy of profits, losses, debts and other financial data reported by companies. They are hired by a company's board of directors - and the shareholders - to make sure that financial statements comply with federal law.

In the wake of the Enron collapse has come a new interest in the accounting profession and the spin on the news is often not too flattering. That's wrong. Accounting professionals play a very important role in our global economy but it's a role not too many people understand.

In a nutshell, auditors certify the accuracy of profits, losses, debts and other financial data reported by companies. They are hired by a company's board of directors - and the shareholders - to make sure that financial statements comply with federal law.

Publicly held companies are required by the Securities and Exchange Commission to issue financial statements that have been independently audited. The independent auditor assures investors that the company's' financial statements conform to generally accepted accounting practices (GAAP).

The audit process

An audit is an evaluation that is based on financial information prepared by the management of the company. The auditor has nothing to do with the preparation of this information. Once it has been provided to the auditor, he or she uses accepted testing techniques and professional expertise and judgment to develop an opinion on the accuracy and fairness of the financial statements.

An auditor speaks only to the company's finances. He or she doesn't express a judgment on how well management is doing its job. Neither does he or she offer advice about investing in or lending to a company nor guarantee that employees are honest and/or qualified.

The framework

It would be impossible for an auditor to examine every transaction so the auditor relies on selective testing techniques. Audits should not be expected to provide pinpoint accuracy. They should, however, give investors a reasonable level of assurance that the financial statements are accurate.

Before an auditor can form an opinion, he or she considers the company's internal control structure. The auditor identifies the risk of error in the financial statements and designs procedures to reduce that risk. The auditor also uses analytical procedures to evaluate financial information through the various stages of the audit.

The report

When an audit is completed, the auditor issues a report. The standard report consists of three paragraphs:

· The first paragraph talks about the different duties of management and the auditor.

· The second paragraph says that the audit was performed to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of errors or irregularities. It also provides a brief description of what is involved in an audit and states that the auditor formed an opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole.

· The last paragraph, the opinion paragraph, contains the auditor's conclusions. The auditor is also expected to take an extra step if the audit raises doubt that the company can stay in business. In that case, he or she has to include an explanation of why the company may be on shaky ground.

Professional opinion

The auditor issues one of the following types of professional opinions. Only the first one is generally considered acceptable for investors' purposes:

· Unqualified (no significant limitations affected audit performance and no material deficiencies exist in the financial statements)

· Qualified (the scope of the auditor's work is significantly restricted, or there is a material departure from generally accepted accounting principles)

· Disclaimer (restrictions in the audit's scope are so pervasive that the auditor cannot form an opinion on the fairness of the presentation)

· Adverse (departures from generally accepted accounting principles are so significant that the financial statements do not fairly represent the company's financial position)

An auditor's opinion is just that -- an opinion. It indicates that a professional judgment, not a guarantee, has been given on management's financial statements. If Enron has taught investors anything, it is that the underlying financial statements -- and all the small footnotes - are just as important as the auditor's report.

In 2009, individuals saving for retirement can take advantage of increased contribution limits for various retirement plans. More money can be socked away with tax advantages like tax-deferred growth and possible tax-deductibility.

In 2009, individuals saving for retirement can take advantage of increased contribution limits for various retirement plans. More money can be socked away with tax advantages like tax-deferred growth and possible tax-deductibility.

Traditional IRAs

Individuals who receive compensation and who are not age 70½ or older can make contributions to Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs). Money saved in a traditional IRA is not taxed until you take it out. Contributions are tax deductible.

For 2009, the maximum amount you can contribute to an IRA is $5,000 (not including rollover contributions) if you are under the age of 50. Individuals age 50 or older can add $1,000 for a total contribution of $6,000 in 2009. These are so-called "catch-up" contributions to help older workers save for retirement. Keep in mind, your contribution may be limited if your income is higher than thresholds set by Congress and you participate in certain employer-sponsored retirement plans. Sometimes, a taxpayer can also contribute to his or her spouse's IRA.

Deductible contributions to a traditional IRA must be made on or before April 15, 2009 (which is generally the deadline to file your federal individual income tax return).

Roth IRAs

Contributions to a Roth IRA are not deductible. Contributions, therefore, are made with after-tax dollars. However, income accrued on Roth IRA contributions is not taxed when it is withdrawn if it is a qualified distribution. A qualified distribution is any one of the following: -- On or after the date the individual attains age 59 ½;

-- For a qualified first-time home purchase

-- To a beneficiary or to the estate of the individual on or after the death of the individual; or

-- As a result of the individual becoming disabled.

As with a traditional IRA, the maximum annual contribution to a Roth IRA is $5,000 in 2009. And, like a traditional IRA, individuals who are 50 or older can make an additional $1,000 in "catch-up" contributions, for a total of $6,000.

Note. For tax years beginning after December 31, 2009, a taxpayer can convert a traditional IRA or make rollover from an eligible retirement plan to a Roth IRA without regard to the his or her income and without regard to whether he or she is a married individual filing a separate return. For conversions taking place before 2010, the taxpayer's adjusted gross income (AGI) cannot exceed $100,000 and the taxpayer cannot be a married individual filing a separate return. For conversions taking place in 2010, the taxpayer recognizes the conversion amount ratably in AGI in 2011 and 2012, unless the taxpayer elects to recognize it all in 2010. However, 2009 is a perfect year to start planning in order to take advantage of the new Roth IRA rules.

401(k)s

An employee can defer as much as $16,500 in 2009 on a pre-tax basis under a 401(k) plan. Employees who are 50 years old by the end of the plan year may make additional "catch-up" payments of up to $5,500 in 2009 (for a total contribution of $22,000). "Catch-up" contributions are also pre-tax, but only can be made if the plan permits. Employers can also make 401(k) contributions for their employees' benefit. In general, an employer's matching 401(k) contributions are not subject to the same annual limit as are employee contributions.

SIMPLE IRA and 401(k) plans

Employers can establish a Savings Incentive Match Plan for Employees (SIMPLE) if 100 or fewer of its employees received at least $5,000 in compensation from the employer last year. Eligible employees can make contributions of up to $11,500 in 2009 (indexed for inflation). Employees who are 50 and over can make additional catch-up contributions of $2,500 in 2009 (for a total of $14,000). Employer contributions to the SIMPLE plan are not included in the annual limit.

Tax-shelter annuity arrangements - 403(b) plans

Public school systems and certain types of tax-exempt organizations may provide retirement benefits to their employees through a tax shelter annuity plan, also referred to as a 403(b) plan. In 2009, employees can contribute up to $16,500 to a 403(b) plan and the maximum catch-up contribution is $5,500. As with other retirement plans, employees who are age 50 and above can make catch-up contributions.

Please contact this office if you have any questions concerning how much, or in what combinations, you can save in 2009 for your retirement on a tax-favored basis.

Have you ever thought about distributions of property dividends (rather than cash dividends) from your corporation?  In some situations, it makes sense to distribute property in lieu of cash for a variety of reasons. However, before you make the decision as to the form of any distributions from your company, you should consider the various tax consequences of such distributions.

Have you ever thought about distributions of property dividends (rather than cash dividends) from your corporation? In some situations, it makes sense to distribute property in lieu of cash for a variety of reasons. However, before you make the decision as to the form of any distributions from your company, you should consider the various tax consequences of such distributions.

A corporation can make a distribution of a "dividend in kind" - which is a property distribution. For such purposes, a distributing corporation's stock and rights for such stock acquisition are not considered to be property. Dividend distributions in these forms are not treated as income that is taxable to the corporation's shareholders, with some important exceptions (e.g., distributions made instead of money; certain distributions made on preferred stock; distributions that are disproportionate; etc.).

A whole host of items can form the basis for your company's next property dividend:

• bonds issued by the government;

• real property;

• the distributing corporation's bonds;

• another corporation's bonds;

• assumption of the indebtedness to a third party of a shareholder;

• transferable vouchers enabling shareholders to receive company products or corporate services discounts;

• promissory notes from customers or other corporate asset purchasers;

• accounts and bills receivable;

• issued transferable vouchers for transportation, by an airline company;

• acquisition options for another corporation's stock; and

• rare coins (e.g., coins having a value that exceed their value as legal tender).

When a corporation distributes property that has increased in value, the corporation will recognize gain, for tax purposes, as if it had sold the property to the shareholder at the property's fair market value. However, the corporation recognizes no loss on distributions of property that have decreased in value. So it you're trying to get rid of property that is not much value to your company anyway, unfortunately, you can't get the added benefit of a loss deduction in planning a property dividend. The distribution amount that is received by a shareholder will be equal to the property's fair market value - decreased by any liabilities that the property is subject to or by any liabilities that the shareholder assumes.

Caution. For shareholders who are not corporations: according to the Tax Court, if a corporation assumes the liability of its shareholder, then at the time of liability assumption the shareholder has a dividend. The shareholder cannot assert a decrease to zero of the dividend due to secondary liability on his or her part. However, the Eighth Circuit has held that when there is a decrease in the shareholder's liability from primary to secondary, there can be no objective assessment of the shareholder's economic benefit so that the shareholder is treated as having no dividend until the corporation pays the debt.

The distribution amount is taxed as a dividend to the extent the corporation has enough earnings and profits in order to cover the distribution. Should the property's value (decreased by any debt) be greater than earnings and profits, the excess does not constitute a dividend. Rather, it is a capital return that is not taxable and is applicable first against the shareholder's basis until there is reduction to zero, at that point representing gain that is subject to taxation.

The shareholder's basis can differ from the corporation's basis in the same property. The shareholder's basis in the property that is distributed is equivalent to the fair market value of the property when it was distributed. Debt does not decrease the value for purposes of basis and the shareholder's basis is a measure of the shareholder's future gain or loss when the property is sold or deductions for depreciation if, in the possession of the shareholder, the property is depreciable.

Property distribution impacts corporate earnings and profits, which increases from gain which a corporation may recognize and decreases by the greater amount of the basis the corporation has in the distributed property or the property's value. The earnings and profits reduction decreases by any debt amount to which the property is subject.

Property dividends may make sense in a variety of circumstances, especially if the property can no longer be put to productive use by your business and only a small amount of taxable gain is at risk of being realized on the distribution. If the property's value is lower than its tax basis, however, a sale followed by a distribution of the cash proceeds may be the better way to go. Please consult the office if you wish to explore the opportunities presented by a possible property dividend in your business situation.

Throughout all of our lives, we have been told that if we don't want to work all of our life, we must plan ahead and save for retirement. We have also been urged to seek professional guidance to help plan our estates so that we can ensure that our loved ones will get the most out of the assets we have accumulated during our lifetime, with the least amount possible going to pay estate taxes.  What many of us likely have not thought about is how these two financial goals -- retirement and estate planning -- work together. 

Throughout all of our lives, we have been told that if we don't want to work all of our life, we must plan ahead and save for retirement. We have also been urged to seek professional guidance to help plan our estates so that we can ensure that our loved ones will get the most out of the assets we have accumulated during our lifetime, with the least amount possible going to pay estate taxes. What many of us likely have not thought about is how these two financial goals -- retirement and estate planning -- work together.

Retirement plan assets are part of taxable estate

When we begin to think about estate planning, one of the first things that we usually do is to take an inventory of what our current assets are and then we project into the future and try to estimate the assets we will have when we die. If you take a moment and think about this right now, aside from your residence, the most valuable asset you currently own (and that you will own at the time of death) is most likely to be your retirement savings (your IRAs, 401(k) accounts, and other employer-sponsored retirement plans). Looking at things from this perspective really drives home the importance of estate planning in connection with saving for retirement.

One of the reasons why we may not think about estate planning in connection with our retirement benefits is that we may have the false notion that these benefits are not part of our "estate" and therefore are not subject to estate tax. This is not true. All of your assets, regardless of the source are part of your estate and subject to estate tax (or, in other words, part of your taxable estate).This means that all of the issues that you may address with a lawyer or accountant or other financial professional regarding planning your estate will also need to be considered when planning for your retirement. When you sit down with a professional to help you plan your estate it is critical that you gather and provide as much information as possible regarding any and all retirement plans in which you participate-all IRAs, 401(k), and other plans sponsored by your employer.

Special issues involved with estate planning for retirement plan assets

Even though the funds that you have in your retirement plans are subject to the same estate planning rules and considerations as any other assets that are part of your estate, there are certain special or unique issues that come into play when you incorporate retirements savings into estate plans. Decisions made with respect to these issues may also have income tax consequences as well as estate tax repercussions. Some of the most important of these issues are:

•  Whether to elect for survivor benefits to be paid to a spouse (sometimes referred to as a joint and survivor annuity);

• Whether you should choose or designate a beneficiary with respect to your interest in an IRA or another retirement plan;

•  The tax differences to beneficiaries who receive benefits on your death but before you have begun to receive pay-out of your benefits and those beneficiaries who begin receiving benefits after retirement payments to you have commenced; and

• Benefits that may be subject to both income tax and estate tax (and are sometimes provided an income tax deduction due to the double taxation)

You must plan carefully to ensure that you get the best possible results regardless of the estate tax rules that are in effect. As you consider becoming more involved in estate and/or retirement planning, please contact the office for additional guidance.

During uncertain economic times, it's easy to feel pessimism and react hastily amid media reports about growing unemployment rates and stock market downturns. However, such actions can wreak havoc on your long-term personal and financial goals. Taking some time out now to put the uncertain future into perspective can help minimize the impact that many external forces can have on your personal and financial life.

During uncertain economic times, it's easy to feel pessimism and react hastily amid media reports about growing unemployment rates and stock market downturns. However, such actions can wreak havoc on your long-term personal and financial goals. Taking some time out now to put the uncertain future into perspective can help minimize the impact that many external forces can have on your personal and financial life.

Prepare for the unexpected. "Always be prepared" is a good motto to live by in order to position yourself, your family, and/or your business to survive and thrive in uncertain economic times. Getting your personal and financial houses in order can result in a viable fallback plan as well as peace of mind.

• Build an emergency fund. We've all heard the sage financial advice to keep 3-6 months of expenses in cash on hand - and many of us have quickly rejected this advice. How much sense does it make to have tens of thousands of dollars sitting around when there are credit card balances to pay off and children's college funds to contribute to? Well, just ask anyone who has unexpectedly lost their job or been faced with a devastating personal tragedy - cash is king. Make your emergency fund priority number one and if 3-6 months of cash seems unreachable to you, consider getting a home equity loan. Low interest rates coupled with high home values can get you into a home equity loan that will cost you little or nothing to maintain each year - an instant emergency fund. And don't procrastinate here - any kind of loan is tough to qualify for when you are unemployed or buried in debt.
• Keep your networking ties fresh. Keeping in touch with peers in your industry can cushion the blow of a job loss as you utilize this network to discover potential job openings. Since people are so mobile in the workplace these days, it's important that you make the effort to stay connected with those who may someday provide you with valuable leads and/or referrals. Remember, networking is a two-way street -- make sure these peers know that they can come to you for the same type of assistance should their careers hit a road bump.

Revisit your portfolio. Call it returning to the scene of the crime - your perhaps battered portfolio probably needs some attention. Revisiting your investment portfolio periodically to make adjustments to take into consideration current economic factors can help you feel a bit more in control of events outside of your control.

• Diversify, diversify, diversify. Diversification is key. It's worth taking the time to ascertain that your portfolio is properly allocated among many different investment vehicles in order to buffer it from potential market downturns or other uncontrollable financial events.
• Keep things in perspective. The stock market moves in a cycle with historically good times as well as bad. Keep your eye on your long-term goals and make sure that any short-term anxiety you may have doesn't knock your portfolio off track and keep you from maximizing your long-term average return.
• Be proactive, not reactive. Certain events - both major and minor - have the ability to send the financial markets on a white-knuckle roller coaster ride. Knee-jerk reactions to daily events unfortunately add more fuel to the fire and can result in an unstable investing environment. On a smaller scale, this same type of reaction can seriously affect your personal investment portfolio as long-term goals are derailed by short-term reactions. This is not to say you should turn a blind eye to current events - on the contrary, it is important to consider these events and their potential impact on your portfolio. However, any changes to your portfolio should be made in a proactive - not reactive - manner, and should take into consideration historical performance as well as possible future trends.

Relax and breathe. Dealing with uncertainty - whether related to your job, investments, health, etc., is never easy and can cause a certain level of anxiety and stress. However, how a person uses this new energy (positively or negatively) can determine their ability to not only survive through the bad times but to thrive as they open themselves up to new opportunities - to get their financial house in order or to prepare themselves to seek out another more fulfilling or secure job or career.

As illustrated above, preparation and perspective are two very important elements need to survive and thrive in an uncertain economy. If you find you need any assistance, do not hesitate to contact the office for additional guidance.

Q:  One of my children received a full scholarship for all expenses to attend college this year.  I had heard that this amount may not be required to be reported on his tax return if certain conditions were met and the funds were used specifically for certain types of her expenses.  Is this true and what amounts spent on my child's education will be treated as qualified expenses?

Q: One of my children received a full scholarship for all expenses to attend college this year. I had heard that this amount may not be required to be reported on his tax return if certain conditions were met and the funds were used specifically for certain types of her expenses. Is this true and what amounts spent on my child's education will be treated as qualified expenses?

A: Any amount received as a "qualified scholarship" or fellowship is not required to be reported as income if your child is a candidate for a degree at an educational institution. For the college that your child attends to be treated as an educational organization, it must (1) be an institution that has as its primary function the presentation of formal instruction, (2) normally maintain a regular faculty and curriculum, and (3) have a regularly enrolled body of students in attendance at the place where the educational activities are regularly carried on. Your child has received a qualified scholarship if he or she can establish, that in accordance with the conditions of the scholarship, the funds received were used for qualified tuition and related expenses.

Qualified tuition and related expenses include tuition and fees required for enrollment or attendance at the educational institution, as well as any fees, books, supplies, and equipment required for courses of instruction at the educational institution. To be treated as related expenses, the fees, books supplies, and equipment must be required of all students in the particular course of instruction. Incidental expenses, such as expenses for room and board, travel, research, equipment, and other expenses that are not required for either enrollment or attendance at the educational institution are not treated as related expenses. Any amounts that are used for room, board and other incidental expenses are not excluded from income.

Example: Assume this year your son received a scholarship in the amount of $20,000 to pay for expenses at a qualified educational institution. His expenses included $12,000 for tuition; $1,100 for books; $900 for lab supplies and fees; and $6,000 for food, housing, clothing, laundry, and other living expenses.

The $14,000 that your son paid for tuition, books and lab supplies and fees are considered to be qualified educational expenses and therefore would not have to be reported as income. The $6,000 that he spent on housing and the other living expenses is considered to be incidental expenses and would have to be reported in his income.

Note: This tax exclusion for qualified scholarships should not be confused with the Hope Scholarship Tax Credit, which has been temporarily renamed the American Opportunity Tax Credit and enhanced for 2009 and 2010 by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The American Opportunity Tax Credit can reach as high as $2,500 for 2009 and 2010 for tuition expenses paid by you for yourself, a spouse or a dependent. Scholarship money that is excluded from income cannot be used in computing your costs for the American Opportunity Tax Credit (i.e. Hope Scholarship Tax Credit). "Financial aid" in the form of student loans, however, is not counted as a scholarship and any money applied to pay tuition can qualify for the Hope Scholarship Tax Credit.

There can be all sorts of complicating factors in assessing whether a particular scholarship will be taxed, such as the treatment of work-study scholarships, educational sabbaticals, scholarships paid by an employer, and stipends to cover the tax on the non-tuition portion of attending a university. If you need additional assistance in determining the taxability of scholarships funds, please contact the office.

How much am I really worth? This is a question that has run through most of our minds at one time or another. However, if you aren't an accountant or mathematician, it may seem like an impossible number to figure out. The good news is that, using a simple step format, you can compute your net worth in no time at all.

How much am I really worth? This is a question that has run through most of our minds at one time or another. However, if you aren't an accountant or mathematician, it may seem like an impossible number to figure out. The good news is that, using a simple step format, you can compute your net worth in no time at all.

Step 1: Gather the necessary documents.

You will need to gather certain documents together in order to have all the ammunition you will need to tackle your net worth calculation. This information is not much different than the information that you would normally gather in anticipation of applying for a home loan, preparing your taxes or getting a property insurance policy. Here's what you'll need the most recent version of:

• Bank statements from all checking and savings accounts (including CDs);
• Statements from your securities broker for all securities owned including retirement accounts;
• Mortgage statements (including home equity loans & lines of credit);
• Credit card statements;
• Student loan statements;
• Loan statements for cars, boats and other personal property

In addition, you will need to have a pretty good idea of the current market value of the following assets you own: real estate, stocks and bonds, jewelry, art & other collectibles, cars, computers, furniture and other major household items, as well as any other substantial personal assets. Current market values can be obtained via a call to your local real estate agent, the stock market and classified ad pages in your newspaper, or qualified appraisers. If you own your own business or hold an interest in a partnership or trust, the current values of these will also need to be gathered.

Step 2: Add together all of your assets.

Your "assets" are items and property that you own or hold title to. They include:

• Current balances in your bank accounts;
• Current market value of any real estate you own;
• Current market value of stocks, bonds & other securities you own;
• Current market value of certain personal articles such as jewelry, art & other collectibles, cars, computers, furniture and other major household items, and any other miscellaneous personal items;
• Amounts owed to you by others (personal loans)
• Current cash value of life insurance policies;
• Current market value of IRAs and self-employed retirement plans;
• Current market value of vested equity in company retirement accounts;
• Current market value of business interests

Step 3: Add together all of your liabilities.

Your "liabilities" are the debts that you owe and are many times connected to the acquisition or leveraging of your assets. They can include:

• Amounts owed on real estate you own;
• Amount owed on credit cards, lines of credit, etc...;
• Amounts owed on student loans;
• Amounts owed to others (personal loans);
• Business loans that you have personally guaranteed;

Step 4: Subtract your liabilities from your assets.

Almost done -- this is the easy part. Take the total of all of your assets and subtract the total of all of your liabilities. The result is your net worth.

Hopefully, once you've done the calculation, you will arrive at a positive number, which means that your assets exceed your debts and you have a positive net worth. However, if you end up with a negative number, it may indicate that your debts exceed your assets and that you have a negative net worth. If the net worth you arrive at differs substantially from the "gut feeling" you have about your financial position, take the time to carefully review your calculation -- it may be that you simply made a calculation error or overlooked some assets that you hold.

Evaluating your outcome

If you ended up with a positive net worth, congratulations! You've probably made some good investment and/or money management decisions in your past. However, keep in mind that your net worth is an ever-changing number that reacts to economic conditions, as well as actions taken by you. It makes sense to periodically revisit this net worth calculation and make the necessary adjustments to ensure that you stay on the right financial track.

If you arrived at a negative net worth, now may be the time to evaluate your holdings and debts to decide what can be done to correct this situation. Are you holding assets that are worth less than you owe on them? Is your consumer debt a large portion of your liabilities? There are many different reasons why you may show a negative net worth, many of which can be corrected to get your financial health restored.

Calculating and understanding how your net worth reflects your current financial position can help you make decisions regarding the effectiveness of your investment and money management strategies. If you need additional assistance during the process of determining your net worth or deciding what actions you can take to improve it, please contact the office for additional guidance.

In addition to direct giving during their lifetimes, many people look at how they can incorporate charitable giving in their estate plans. While many options are available, one plan that allows you help charities and preserve and grow assets for your beneficiaries at the same time is a charitable lead annuity trust.

In addition to direct giving during their lifetimes, many people look at how they can incorporate charitable giving in their estate plans. While many options are available, one plan that allows you help charities and preserve and grow assets for your beneficiaries at the same time is a charitable lead annuity trust.

Fixed payments to charity

When you set up a charitable lead annuity trust (or CLAT, for short), the intention is for the assets of the trust, and the income they generate, to ultimately one day pass to one or more non-charitable beneficiaries, for example, your children. Before then, however, you may want one or more charities to receive some of the funds. Under a typical CLAT, the charity receives a fixed payout for a pre-determined number of years or, in some cases, for the lives of specified persons. The payments to the charity remain the same regardless of how the trust performs and no minimum payment is required. In most cases, the rules do not allow your beneficiaries to receive anything from the trust until the trust ends.

Individuals who can be used as the measuring lives would be restricted to the donor's life, the life of the donor's spouse, or a lineal ancestor of the beneficiaries. The IRS did this to prevent abuse of CLATs. Some people have tried to artificially inflate the tax benefits of CLATs by using unrelated individuals, such as those who were seriously ill and were expected to die prematurely, as the measuring lives.

Tax benefits

When the trust ends, the assets of the trust and the income earned by the trust pass to your beneficiaries tax-free. That is a potentially huge savings of federal estate and gift taxes. The top federal estate and gift tax rate in 2009 is 45 percent. If the original trust assets were passed directly to your heirs, taxes could reduce significantly your bequest. Placing the assets in a CLAT helps to preserve - and more importantly - grow them. The estate tax is fixed when the CLAT is created and not when the assets pass to your beneficiaries.

Generally, income paid to the charity is subject to tax by the owner of the trust. However, careful planning, such as funding the trust with tax-exempt bonds, can reduce or eliminate any tax liability on the part of the owner.

Timing the creation of a CLAT

CLATS need not be set-up after you die. You can fund a CLAT today and see the benefit of your gift as a charity makes good use of it. However, if you want to create a CLAT during your life, keep in mind that you will not be able to use assets in the trust.

A CLAT -- created either before or after your death -- can continue your legacy of giving to your favorite charities, while yielding overall tax savings for you and your family. Please contact the office if you have any questions on how a CLAT, or another variety of charitable trust, might work for you.

Q:The holidays are approaching and I would like to consider giving gifts of appreciation to my employees. What kinds of gifts can I give my employees that they would not have to declare as income on their tax returns? I also would like to make sure my company would be able to deduct the costs of these gifts.

A:First of all, anything given in the business setting is presumed, until proven otherwise, not to be a gift (e.g., is taxable income) -- that is, you are either rewarding an employee for work done or providing an incentive in which he or she will be inclined to do more work in the future. However, the Tax Code and related IRS regulations still allow many gifts to remain tax-free to the employee while being tax deductible to the business. Here is a short list of the rules:

$25 gift rule

A business may deduct up to $25 in gifts given to each recipient during any given year. However, you can't get around this limit by giving to each family member of the intended recipient: they all share in one $25 limit. Items clearly of an advertising nature such as promotional items do not count as long as the item costs $4 or less.

No dollar limit exists on a deduction if the gift is given to a corporation or a partnership. The cost of gifts such as baseball tickets that will be used by an unidentified group of employees also qualifies for the unlimited deduction. However, once again, if the gift is intended eventually to go to a particular individual shareholder or partner, the deduction is limited to $25.

Separate "de minimis" rules

A "de minimis" fringe benefit from employer to employee is considered to be made tax-free to the employee. "De minimis" fringe benefits are not restricted by the $25 per recipient limit otherwise applicable outside of the employer-employee context. However, de minimis fringe benefits must be small "within reason." Typical de minimis gifts include holiday gifts such as a turkey or ham, the occasional company picnic, occasional use of the photocopy machine, occasional supper money, or flowers sent to a sick employee.

The general guidelines for de minimis fringe benefits are:

• the value of the gift must be nominal,
• accounting for all such gifts would be administratively nitpicking,
• the gifts are only occasional, and
• they are given "to promote health, good will, contentment, or efficiency" of employees.

Unfortunately, "gifts of nominal value" exclude such perks as use of a company lodge, season theater tickets, or country club dues. These cannot be given tax-free to an employee. But they do include occasional theater or sports tickets or group meals.

What's more, fringe benefits such as the use of an on-premise athletic facility or subsidized cafeteria are specifically included under IRS rules as de minimis fringe benefits. The traditional gold retirement watch -- or similar gift-- to commemorate a long period of employment is also treated as de minimis. However, cash or items readily convertible into cash, such as gift certificates, are taxable, no matter what the amount.